Blog

  • 2018 Southwest Super Lawyers

    Dear Stephen D Aarons,

    Congratulations on your selection to the 2018 Southwest Super Lawyers list!

    Sincerely,

    Bruce Harries
    Associate Publisher
    651-244-6795
    bruce.harries@thomsonreuters.com
  • Conviction in Taos CSP Case

    After a four day trial in Taos before Judge Emilio J. Chavez, David Lewis was convicted of all four counts of criminal sexual penetration (CSP) of a minor. He was remanded into custody for a 60-day evaluation before his sentence in January 2018. He will receive a minimum of eighteen years in prison with the maximum exposure in excess of sixty (60) years.

  • Acquittal in Las Cruces Federal Drug Case

    United States v. Manuel Pavón-Rodríguez

    United States District Court – District of New Mexico – Case No. 2:17-cr-01923-JB-2

       After a four day trial in Las Cruces Federal Court before Judge Robert Brack, a 12-person jury returned with four “not guilty” verdicts as to Manuel Pavón-Rodríguez. His attorney, Stephen D Aarons, explained that Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez had been indicted by the grand jury for possession with intent to distribute 246 pounds (111 kilograms) of illegal drugs. Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez and his co-defendant, John Milne, were arrested near Rodeo New Mexico and the drugs were discovered in five burlap backpacks in the back of Milne’s Ford Explorer. Mr. Milne was represented by two federal public defenders and he was convicted on all counts.

    Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez testified that he had emigrated to New Mexico over 15 years ago and is living in Santa Fe with his wife and four children. He needed to return to his birthplace after the death of h is parents to check up on his two brothers, one of whom has Downs Syndrome. He hired an outfit to return him illegally across the border. Others being transported earned their way by carrying the heavy back packs each loaded with 50-100 pounds of contraband, but Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez had paid a full fare and did not carry any drugs. Although Mr. Pavón-Rodríguez was released after his acquittal by all twelve jurors, it was not clear whether his immigration lawyer could obtain a stay from deportation given his family situation. Without any felony drug conviction, however, he will be eligible to apply in the future to become a permanent resident or naturalized citizen.


    Después de un juicio de cuatro días en el Tribunal Federal de Las Cruces ante el juez Robert Brack, un jurado de 12 personas regresó con cuatro veredictos de “no culpable” en cuanto al Manuel Pavón-Rodríguez. Su abogado, Stephen D Aarons, explicó que el Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez había sido acusado por el gran jurado de posesión con la intención de distribuir 246 libras (111 kilogramos) de drogas ilegales. El Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez y su codemandado, John Milne, fueron arrestados cerca de Rodeo New Mexico y las drogas fueron descubiertas en cinco mochilas de arpillera en la parte trasera del Ford Explorer de Milne. El Sr. Milne estuvo representado por dos defensores públicos federales y fue condenado por todos los cargos.

    El Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez testificó que había emigrado a Nuevo México hace más de 15 años y que vive en Santa Fe con su esposa y cuatro hijos. Tenía que regresar a su lugar de nacimiento después de la muerte de los padres de H para controlar a sus dos hermanos, uno de los cuales tiene el síndrome de Downs. Él contrató un equipo para devolverlo ilegalmente al otro lado de la frontera. Otros que se transportaban ganaban llevándose los pesados ​​mochilas cargadas con 50 a 100 libras de contrabando, pero el Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez había pagado una tarifa completa y no llevaba drogas. Aunque el Sr. Pavón-Rodríguez fue liberado después de su absolución por los doce miembros del jurado, no estaba claro si su abogado de inmigración podría obtener una suspensión de la deportación dada su situación familiar. Sin embargo, sin una condena por delitos graves de drogas, podrá postularse en el futuro para convertirse en residente permanente o ciudadano naturalizado.

     

    Count 1: On or about June 23, 2017, in Hidalgo County, in the District ofNew Mexico, and elsewhere, the defendants, JOHN LEROY MILNE and MANUEL PAVON-RODRIGUEZ, unlawfully, knowingly and intentionally combined, conspired, confederated, agreed, and acted interdependently with each other and with other persons whose names are known and unknown to the Grand Jury to commit an offense defined in 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(l) and (b)(1)(B), specifically, distribution of 100 kilograms and more of marijuana. In violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Verdict: NOT GUILTY

    Count 2: On or about June 23, 2017, in Hidalgo County, in the District of New Mexico, the defendants, JOHN LEROY MILNE and MANUEL PAVON-RODRIGUEZ, unlawfully, knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute a controlled substance, 100 kilograms and more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of marijuana. In violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C.§ 2. Verdict: NOT GUILTY

  • Rogu3 Warri0r Review

    Hopefully I will be able to afford Mr. Aarons to defend my case! I was impressed with Mr. Aarons’ professional approach and the time he spent to tell me about my legal issues, including going over my case with me, and ultimately helping me to determine my next best route legally speaking! I am grateful to lawyers like Mr. Stephen D Aarons!

  • Five-Star Yelp Review

    [column width=”1/1″ last=”true” title=”” title_type=”single” animation=”none” implicit=”true”]

    Mr. Aarons is an excellent attorney. We ran into a situation where we were in need of a top defense lawyer. Our entire life was turned upside down when my husband was wrongfully accused of a crime that had him facing over 87 years in prison. Mr. Aarons was prompt in getting us in for an initial appointment (same day we called). He showed up to every court date, answered every message/phone call, and email. He was sensitive to our needs and always reassured us that he was on our side and fighting his hardest for us. He filed motions to remove my husbands ankle bracelet and filed extensions when they were needed. He is a lawyer that knows his stuff and we know we can count on him. He has a great team, people that are friendly and proficient. Anytime we needed to speak to him in person he always made time (the afternoon on the day we called or the morning after). Anytime there was an update on the case I either got a text message or an email. He is a highly recommended (on our list) criminal lawyer. Mr. Aarons worked hard on our case, very professional, and always included us in all the decisions he made. After reviewing the case Mr.Aarons emailed back and fourth with the DA (and myself to keep us updated). My husband was offered a plea deal to serve 20years (80% of that time to be served, no good time, or time served) with no prior criminal history. Mr. Aarons refused the plea because he knew the case and knew that his client wasn’t guilty of the alleged crime. We put our trust into Mr. Aarons’ hands and eventually had our case dismissed. I strongly recommend Mr. Aarons to anyone that has a criminal case and wants a trustworthy, knowledgeable, friendly lawyer that will fight his hardest, put in effort, and keep you updated on your case.

    [/column]

  • Charges Dismissed against Robbery Suspect

    • By Phaedra Haywood | The New Mexican

    Two men who were held at gunpoint during a robbery of their medical cannabis production plant in 2013 broke down Monday while describing the ordeal during a jury trial of one of the defendants.

    “He put the gun to my head and and said, ‘stay calm,’ ” said Peter Ferrera a partner in the business, his voice cracking. “And I stayed calm and I just laid there with my head on the desk and the the gun to my head. I felt like I was gonna die. I felt like I wasn’t ever going to get to see my family again and that’s all I could think about.”

    Reyes Barela, 32, the defendant, is one of four men police believe were involved in the heist. The robbers tied the two businessmen to chairs and made off with $30,000 to $50,000 worth of cannabis that had been dried, cured and made ready for sale. They also stole Baker’s vehicle.

    Mark Baker, Ferrera’s friend and business partner, also became emotional recounting the robbery. Baker said he’d been working in another room that day and entered the area where Ferrera was after hearing loud voices.

    “Immediately there was a gun in my face, a barrel in my face,” said Baker who described his assailant as slight of build with “buggy eyes and a very big handgun.”

    “I immediately dropped my head and put my hands up and said, ‘Whatever you need. Whatever you want I will help you.’ I didn’t want to get shot in the head. I felt like if I threatened this guy the least amount he might pull the trigger.”

    Baker said he got out of the medical cannabis business because of the robbery.

    Neither eyewitness positively identified Barela, saying they did not get a good look at the robbers’ faces.

    Police Detective Paul Prentice testified that the initial investigation into the robbery turned up no useful leads. It was essentially a cold case until 2015, when a suspect in another case provided a tip that led police to Barela and several other men.

    Prosecutors showed a videotape Monday of their interview with Barela in which he repeatedly asked for assurance that the detectives would help him avoid jail time if he cooperated. He denied taking part in the robbery, then admitted being there but said he didn’t have a gun.

    Barela, of Rio Rancho, is charged with 12 felony counts. They include two counts of first-degree kidnapping — presumably for preventing the men from leaving the building during the robbery — two counts of robbery, two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, two counts of false imprisonment, theft of a motor vehicle, tampering with evidence and conspiracy to commit armed robbery.

     

    According to court records, Jose Nava, one of the other men whose names were mentioned in connection with the case faced charges almost identical to Barela’s until Sept. 21. Then the district attorney dismissed them. A man whom Prentice identified as someone who had placed himself at the crime scene and identified the others in 2015 does not appear to have been charged in the case.

     

    Nava’s attorney, Stephen Aarons, said Monday the charges against Nava were dismissed after the informant who placed Nava at the scene recanted. Aarons also said Nava had “a pretty ironclad alibi” that he was at work when the robbery happened.

     

    Barela is also the defendant in another pending case in the Santa Fe-area judicial district in which he’s charged with four counts of armed robbery and four counts of conspiracy. He was also charged with armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery in a 2015 case originating in Rio Rancho that was dismissed in May. And a Santa Fe jury in July acquitted Barela in a 2015 case in which he faced charges of aggravated burglary, conspiracy to commit aggravated burglary and larceny.

    Barela’s trial will continue Tuesday.

    Contact Phaedra Haywood at 986-3068 or phaywood@sfnewmexican.com. Follow her on Twitter at @phaedraann.

    [/column]

  • Ironclad Alibi Causes Dismissal

    Robbery of Cannabis Facility | Santa Fe New Mexican Article by Phaedra Haywood

    According to court records, Jose Nava, one of the other men whose names were mentioned in connection with the case faced charges almost identical to Barela’s until September 21. The the district attorney dismissed them. A man whom Prentice identified as someone who had placed himself at the crime scene and identified the others in 2015 does not appear to have been charged in the case.

    Nava’s attorney, Stephen Aarons, said Monday the charges against Nava were dismissed after the informant who placed Nava at the scene recanted. Aarons also said Nava had a “pretty ironclad alibi” that he was at work when the robbery happened.

  • Martindale-Hubbell’s Client Champion

    CONGRATULATIONS! YOU EARNED OUR SILVER CLIENT CHAMPION AWARD!

    Your clients think you are wonderful and so do we! Because your clients have highly recommended you, we are thrilled to award you our new Silver Client Champion award!

    Fewer than 1% of attorneys have achieved Martindale-Hubbell’s newest award, making you part of an elite group. This complimentary benefit showcases your approach and commitment to the best in client service.

    Your Silver Client Champion award appears on your Lawyers.com and Martindale.com profiles to differentiate you from competitors and confirm your credibility for consumers. You also will be able to display your award on your website, email signature and other marketing materials at no additional cost. Once your client champion award is ready, we will notify you via email with download instructions.

    To keep your Silver Client Champion status, you will need to continue receiving fresh reviews and maintain at least a 4.0 client rating average. Read our blog to learn helpful tips on how to ask your clients for a review.

    Have questions? Read more about our Client Champion awards or join our webinar on September 26th at 1:30 PM EDT to learn more.

    Regards,

    Martindale-Hubbell Ratings Services
    Rating Attorneys for 150 Years
    121 Chanlon Road Suite 110
    New Providence, NJ, 07974, USA
    Copyright 2016 Internet Brands, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • 25 Years Top Rated Martindale-Hubbell

    MH which runs lawyers dot com has been rating lawyers for 150 years!